Quantum FFF Rigid String Theory ( FFF= Function Follws string Form)

QUANTUM FFF topological STRING THEORY and the Fermion Propeller.
http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk
https://www.flickr.com/photos_user.gne?
path=&nsid=93308747%40N05&page=&details=1

If the big bang was the splitting of a huge Axion/ Higgs particle Dark Matter Black Hole (ELISIUM DM- BH) nucleus into smaller DM-BH nuclei, then no standard Fermion/ Baryon inflation has happened only the DM-BH based Lyman alpha forest equipped with local Herbig Haro star/galaxy creating systems.

All black holes of all sizes (down to ball lightning) seem to be equipped with a Fermion repelling- and plasma producing horizon, which has also a charge splitting effect into a negative (outside) and positive ( inside) zone ( see oriental basin of the moon) .Conclusion, all Bhs are: "Negative Charged Electric Dark Matter Black Holes" with a rigid open string sector with intrinsic 3x hinging curvature.

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Axial Symmetric and Pear shaped Atom Nuclei through the massless resistive Axion Higgs field.

Magic Number Based Axial Ring Structure of Atomic Nuclei. 

Nuclear (Proton-Neutron) geometric distribution based on Magic Number data supported by LHC nuclear imaging.   
Below: B.Bucher et al. discovered via  LHC at Geneva a pear shaped nuclear variant, pointing into only one fixed direction in space.
Dr Scheck says: "We've found these nuclei literally point towards a ( fixed) direction in space. This relates to a direction in time, proving there's a well-defined direction in time and we will always travel from past to present."
He says: "Further, the protons enrich in the bump of the pear and create a specific charge distribution in the nucleus.
Conclusion, according to Quantum FFF Model:  the electron shell around the nucleus will contract along the central axis of the pear shaped nucleus.
The result ;  contraction of the atom sphere and thus contraction into the absolute direction of flight against the energetic oscillating vacuum lattice.
see: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-36597142?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link

So my proposal is, that he found the spacetime reference frame for the laboratory location.
In Quantum FFF Theory terms: he found the reference frame of the massless but resistive oscillating Axion -Higgs field.
see: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313730647_How_to_Teach_Special_Relativity_and_atomic_pear_shaped_contraction





Polarized Fermions (Nuclear Quarks) as the origin of non accelerated motion.

Polarized Fermions (Nuclear Quarks) as the origin of non accelerated motion through the resistive oscillating vacuum Higgs field.
Polarized nucleons found by B. Bucher et al. (LHC Geneva) see: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.01485v1.pdf 
see also: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-36597142?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link

Dr Scheck says: "We've found these nuclei literally point towards a direction in space"
He says: "Further, the protons enrich in the bump of the pear and create a specific charge distribution in the nucleus.
IMHO, this charge distribution should also be responsible for a disk shaped electron shell perpendicular to the direction of motion ( flight) and responsible for the so called " Lorentz contraction" of all objects into the direction of absolute motion through the resistive Higgs vacuum lattice. 
Attention: This is also against special relativity.strongly supported by John Bell in his essay "How to teach special relativity".
A disk shaped Proton charge distribution could be called also the origin of a disk shaped electron shell distribution.as the origin of the Lorentz contraction effect .
As a consequence,, The Uri Geller deformation of metal objects could be related to a external magnetic deformation of nucleons in the same way as the Lorentz contraction deformation of the electron shells of the metal atoms.
Even levitation can not be excluded if the pear shaping of Fermions could be external influenced in the same way.

The Quantum FFF Model differences: What are the main differences of Q-FFFTheory with the standard model? 
1, A Fermion repelling- and producing electric dark matter black hole. 
2, An electric dark matter black hole splitting Big Bang with a 12x distant symmetric instant entangled raspberry multiverse result, each with copy Lyman Alpha forests. 
3, Fermions are real propeller shaped rigid convertible strings with dual spin and also instant multiverse entanglement ( Charge Parity symmetric) . 
4, The vacuum is a dense tetrahedral shaped lattice with dual oscillating massless Higgs particles ( dark energy). 
5, All particles have consciousness by their instant entanglement relation between 12 copy universes, however, humans have about 500 m.sec retardation to veto an act. ( Benjamin Libet).

 It was Abdus Salam who proposed that quarks and leptons should have a sub-quantum level structure, and that they are compound rigid particles with a specific non-zero sized form. 
Jean Paul Vigier postulated that quarks and leptons are "pushed around" by an energetic sea of vacuum particles. 
David Bohm suggested in contrast with the "Copenhagen interpretation", that reality is not created by the eye of the human observer, and second: elementary particles should be "guided by a pilot wave". 
John Bell argued that the motion of mass related to the surrounding vacuum reference frame, should originate real "Lorentz-transformations", and also real relativistic measurable contraction. 
Richard Feynman postulated the idea of an all pervading energetic quantum vacuum. He rejected it, because it should originate resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the quantum vacuum. 
However, I postulate the strange and counter intuitive possibility, that this resistance for mass in motion, can be compensated, if we combine the ideas of Vigier, Bell, Bohm and Salam, and a new dual universal Bohmian "pilot wave", which is interpreted as the EPR correlation (or Big Bang entanglement) between individual elementary anti-mirror particles, living in dual universes. 
Conclusion, There is reason to make some corrections to Einstein’s models. Even the lightspeed through the solar system and abroad, seems to be gravity related. See: Numbered listing of Vixra essays by Leo Vuyk. http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk